"Take physic, pomp.
Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel,
That thou may'st shake the superflux to them
And show the heavens more just." (3.4.38-41)
By itself this these lines tell rich people to notice the poor, and give them some of the excess stuff they have. In the context of the book this in the part where Lear is talking about poor Tom, because he was exposed to him during the storm. So these lines are geared more towards himself than to an actual person. This passage helps connect with the theme that the crazier one gets the more wisdom he has, although it only comes in bursts. Lear never would have said anything like this near the beginning of the book, because he did not care about anyone but himself. Personally this passage really made sense to me, and I feel it is a very key passage in the book. Lear realizes his faults and shows compassion to those worse off than him, changing the way he is viewed entirely.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
King Lear 3
"GONERIL You see how full of changes his age is; the
Observation we have made of it hath (not) been
Little. He always loved our sister most, and with
What poor judgement he hath now cast her off
Appears too grossly" (King Lear, 1.1.334-338).
"GONERIL ( [...]Idle old man
That still would manage those authorities
That he hath given away. Now, by my life,
Old fools are babes again and must be used
With checks as flatteries, when they are seen
abused)" (King Lear, 1.3.17-22).
I chose these because they mention how age affects people. It appears that age makes a person immature and clouds their minds. Either that or that's just what Goneril thinks, because both the quotes are hers. I think the fool says something about age, but I could only use two. It also appears that Shakespeare uses old age to represent immaturity because it contrasts with the way they should be acting the most.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
King Lear 2
The fool appears to be the only one who can make fun of the king. He mocks the king, who apparently thinks he is joking and goes along with it. He is characterized by his dialogue, which is in verse instead of prose. He also uses lots of dirty humor, and seems to be one of the smartest people in the play, with lots of insight. I see the fool as a character who acts silly on the outside so no one will take him seriously, giving him the most freedom in the kingdom.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
King Lear 1
The relation between power and love is very strong. The two sisters Goneril and Regan pronounce their love for their father with very over the top language not because they love him that much, but because he has power, and they want some of it for themselves. Also Burgundy said he loved Cordelia, but chooses not to marry her because she no longer has the land that was previously came with her marriage. And King Lear himself loves the power he has, and will only give to his daughters if they say they love him.
Friday, December 18, 2009
Blood Wedding 3
From the diary of the Bride:
Dear Diary,
I'm getting married tomorrow. So much good will come from this, I'm sure of it. But I can't help thinking about Leonardo. He's so much more of a man than my husband-to-be, and... No! What am I writing? I will not run off with Leonardo! I have a good life right now, and I am not going to shame myself and my family by leaving my husband, despite how dry he is. Leonardo just has so much life to him, like it's practically flowing out of him. He asked me to leave with him last night. It's so very tempting, just him and me, alone... No! I can't forsake my husband! What would his mother say? Oh, who am I fooling? I know I will run off with him. I shouldn't though. I must be mad for even considering it. But I can't help it. It's decided then. During the wedding, we will sneak out, undetected, and make for the river, which we will follow into the woods. This will probably be the last time I write in here. To anyone who reads this, this is goodbye.
Dear Diary,
I'm getting married tomorrow. So much good will come from this, I'm sure of it. But I can't help thinking about Leonardo. He's so much more of a man than my husband-to-be, and... No! What am I writing? I will not run off with Leonardo! I have a good life right now, and I am not going to shame myself and my family by leaving my husband, despite how dry he is. Leonardo just has so much life to him, like it's practically flowing out of him. He asked me to leave with him last night. It's so very tempting, just him and me, alone... No! I can't forsake my husband! What would his mother say? Oh, who am I fooling? I know I will run off with him. I shouldn't though. I must be mad for even considering it. But I can't help it. It's decided then. During the wedding, we will sneak out, undetected, and make for the river, which we will follow into the woods. This will probably be the last time I write in here. To anyone who reads this, this is goodbye.
Monday, December 14, 2009
Blood Wedding2
A writer usually attempts to create a bond of trust between writer and reader. How and to what extent have at least two writers you have studied been able to elicit your trust?
In Blood Wedding, the author attempts to create a bond between the reader and the bridegroom by showing him as a good, honest man. This contrasts with the image of the bride, who runs away with another man during her wedding, making her look very bad in the readers eyes. She is not nearly as trustworthy as the bridegroom. Same with the mother, who appears to be a little crazy and judgemental.
In Wild Duck, a bond is formed between the reader and Hedvig. She appears to be so innocent, and the reader sympathizes with her because she does not know she is going blind. The reader also trusts Gregers, because he talks of his good intentions throughout the book, so the reader knows he is a good man, even though they do not turn out like they should. Ibsen's methods work very well, because the circumstances he created in the story help portray the extremes of the situation.
In Blood Wedding, the author attempts to create a bond between the reader and the bridegroom by showing him as a good, honest man. This contrasts with the image of the bride, who runs away with another man during her wedding, making her look very bad in the readers eyes. She is not nearly as trustworthy as the bridegroom. Same with the mother, who appears to be a little crazy and judgemental.
In Wild Duck, a bond is formed between the reader and Hedvig. She appears to be so innocent, and the reader sympathizes with her because she does not know she is going blind. The reader also trusts Gregers, because he talks of his good intentions throughout the book, so the reader knows he is a good man, even though they do not turn out like they should. Ibsen's methods work very well, because the circumstances he created in the story help portray the extremes of the situation.
Blood Wedding1
Stylistic techniques:
The author creates a motif of knives to show how he feels about death. He uses a knife because knives are usually very small, so even the smallest things can kill someone. He also uses a very dynamic speaking style. The characters' dialogue ranges from one word to multiple paragraphs, although they average at about one sentence. This makes the plot seem to go by very quickly, and it cuts away most of the detail in the dialogue. The author also has the characters speaking in poetry, although it does not make much sense in the plot. There is also a motif of nature in the story. The land where the bridegroom lives is barren, while the bride is from a place rich in plant life. Where the characters are from seems to reflect how they act. The bridegroom is very dry, while the bride seems to be very passionate, although not much so about the bridegroom.
The author creates a motif of knives to show how he feels about death. He uses a knife because knives are usually very small, so even the smallest things can kill someone. He also uses a very dynamic speaking style. The characters' dialogue ranges from one word to multiple paragraphs, although they average at about one sentence. This makes the plot seem to go by very quickly, and it cuts away most of the detail in the dialogue. The author also has the characters speaking in poetry, although it does not make much sense in the plot. There is also a motif of nature in the story. The land where the bridegroom lives is barren, while the bride is from a place rich in plant life. Where the characters are from seems to reflect how they act. The bridegroom is very dry, while the bride seems to be very passionate, although not much so about the bridegroom.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)